Quick answer
Both methods produce a measured air permeability value that can replace the worst-case default on your EPC. A pulse test is quieter and quicker, making it the more practical choice for occupied rental properties. A blower door test suits larger or more complex buildings. Neither requires building work.
Pulse Test vs Blower Door Test
| Pulse Test | Blower Door Test | |
|---|---|---|
| Method | Short, quiet burst of air; measures pressure equalisation | Large fan depressurises the whole building |
| Noise / disruption | Low - suitable for occupied homes | Louder, takes longer to set up |
| Best suited to | Occupied rental properties, quick assessments | Larger or more complex buildings |
| Building work required | None | None |
Which Should You Choose?
For most tenanted rental properties, a pulse test's speed and low disruption make it the more practical option. Whichever method you choose, the outcome is the same: a measured air permeability value that can replace the worst-case default on your EPC certificate, potentially improving your score without any building work. Not sure if your EPC is currently using a default? Learn more about air tightness testing and your EPC score.
Frequently Asked Questions
Try Our Free EPC Compliance Planner
Check your property's current air tightness status, free.
On this page
Related guides